Date: 28th October 2019 at 7:00am
Written by:

Few Aston Villa fans expected anything from Saturday’s trip to the Etihad Stadium to face Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City and in many ways, it was always going to be likely that the best we could hope for would be a point – so all eyes were on our overall performance and seeing further improvements in our organisation and style of play.

Largely, we probably got that but with Video Assistant Referee technology seriously screwing us so far in the campaign of 2019/20, that became the single talking point for most following the match.

Nobody can deny that second half, after our more impressive 45 minutes, City didn’t deserve the win – they took advantage initially of another defensive mistake, but in what became a 3-0 defeat, it’s the second goal that took the headlines.

VAR decided in its infinite lack of wisdom that the goal was scored by Kevin De Bruyne, therefore neither Raheem Sterling nor David Silva were offside. Fair’s fair, Silva wasn’t in that circumstance but in crossing Tom Heaton’s path, Sterling clearly interfered with play.

As Dean Smith intimated post-game, giving De Bruyne the goal got VAR out of jail in some ways, as Sterling surprisingly didn’t become part of the conversation as everyone focused on whether Silva got the touch, and had he, then they believed Sterling came into play – which is just flat out wrong based on the laws of the game unless I’m having a serious blonde moment.

Interfering with play, obstructing the goalkeeper’s view – these aren’t new concepts.

As fans will be keenly aware, almost immediately after the final whistle, the dubious goals panel (or whatever they’ve been renamed to) confirmed what we all knew.

After all, it’s not like Silva claimed the touch and told the referee it was his goal instantly was it!?

The added caveat sentence from the Premier League wasn’t missed by anyone either. But still, Sterling was offside in both cases, and it took us a while to get our spirit back after the second, so it can easily be argued incompetence affected the game hugely, even if few would argue it would’ve changed the fact we would’ve lost the game, and City overall, deserved to win.

VAR was supposed to clear up clear and obvious errors, that’s what it was sold on and we aren’t the only side to now regularly see an incompetent and pointless referee show favouritism (whilst hidden near Heathrow) – dare I mention idiotic duo David Coote and Martin Atkinson and their almost identical re-run of Conor Hourihane’s goal against Brighton, when it comes to the Manchester United v Liverpool match.

What should clearly be an advantage to the game and the referee’s themselves, is being undermined based on how senior a muppet with a whistle is considered to be by his colleagues it seems – and it’s the same well known senior muppet’s who fail week in week out, whether they actually have to run around a pitch or not.

The game I grew up loving died a long time ago when it came to the money and primadonnas falling over like they’d been shot and that’s before I get onto the authorities who have barely kicked a ball in the lives, but if something isn’t done about VAR soon it could be the nail that the coffin can’t come back from.

Villa aren’t alone in the Premier League, and just like the penalty argument about decisions evening themselves out over a season – that certainly won’t be true – but at least we aren’t alone in football full stop at seeing VAR become the AI monster that loses control of itself.

Michael Eberwein concedes penalty while warming up – BBC

Previous Article:

“Absolute Class” “Nothing Better” – These Villa Fans Praise Summer Arrival & Some See Mellberg Comparisons

Click for the forum

3 Replies to “It’s Clear & Obvious That VAR Is Not Fit For Purpose & The Premier League Know It”

  • I suspect the issue is that even with all of the perceived errors the Premier League are unlikely to make any changes to the process before the end of the season as they potentially leave themselves open to legal action by clubs which have suffered by decisions made prior to any changes. Imagine a club being relegated on one goal-difference which had a really obvious VAR error made against it and the criteria for that disallowed goal had been changed mid-season.

  • Haven’t posted for a long time but I’m going to come out and say it: is VAR a tool for manipulators of matches/results, otherwise why would there be so many questionable decisions made by faceless adjudicators? I’d also question favouritism [or lack thereof] to certain sides. This second point might also be a stretch, but Crystal Palace, I notice, benefitted once again from another dubious decision by VAR. The frequency of ‘clear’ errors alone has to bring into question the motives/application of VAR. I agree with the ‘what do you do about it?’ point though as legal cases would certainly be brought against the Premier League if there was anything found to be untoward, particularly where a point here or there might make the difference between relegation, European football, or even winning the league. Nevertheless, getting it right in games to come has to be a start!

    Good performance in large parts again this weekend from Villa. Hoping it will click more often than not in the coming weeks and as much as I want Wesley to do well, Davis surely has to start against Liverpool. UTV!

  • Should go back to basics.

    Ref does what they have always done. Linesman does what they have always done.

    VAR ref keeps out of it completely.

    Both sides get three reviews. Ref messes up or linesman, so call a review. VAR checks for obvious errors such as a blatant off side.

    Why complicate matters?

Your Comment